Corporate & Commercial

Contracts, structures and governance for businesses that need the paperwork to hold when something goes wrong.

Mergers & Acquisitions

Buying or selling a business, from the term sheet and due diligence through to completion and the restraints that follow.

Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Commercial disputes in the NSW, ACT and Federal courts, resolved early where that is possible and run properly where it is not.

Government and Defence

Supplying government and the defence industry.

Technology and Software

Your product scales digitally. Your contracts have to scale with it.

Financial Services

A regulated business, on solid legal footing.

Legal Administration Assistant, Canberra

Canberra office, full time, on site.

Wahlstation for German Referendare

Sydney or Canberra, open all year.

The track record

Judgments and tribunal outcomes, transactions completed, appointments taken, and the conversations we are part of in Australia and in Germany.

Germany

A German desk for businesses moving between Australia and the German-speaking market.

Singapore

Singapore law where it governs the contract, and the arbitral seat that carries much of the region’s work.

Vietnam

Market entry, supply arrangements and dispute resolution for Vietnam.

COURT AND TRIBUNAL

Aboud v Aboud: verdict for our client on a claim over family chattels

24 July 2009
A claim was brought in the District Court of New South Wales for the return of a long list of household items, on the footing that they belonged to the plaintiff’s parents rather than to our client, who had lived with and cared for them.
The Court found for our client on every disputed item: Aboud v Aboud [2009] NSWDC 183. The items fell into three groups, being possessions sent to our client while she was living in London, items given by her father shortly before his death, and items given by her mother while our client lived in the family home.
Each group turned on the two requirements of a gift of goods, being an intention to give and delivery. The Court held that the words used in each case showed an intention to give without qualification, and that delivery was made out, in some instances constructively, which is the settled position for chattels passing between members of one household. Our client was entitled to a verdict on the claim, with costs to follow the event.
Read the judgment: AustLII

Sydney

Canberra

Frankfurt a.M.