Corporate & Commercial

Contracts, structures and governance for businesses that need the paperwork to hold when something goes wrong.

Mergers & Acquisitions

Buying or selling a business, from the term sheet and due diligence through to completion and the restraints that follow.

Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Commercial disputes in the NSW, ACT and Federal courts, resolved early where that is possible and run properly where it is not.

Government and Defence

Supplying government and the defence industry.

Technology and Software

Your product scales digitally. Your contracts have to scale with it.

Financial Services

A regulated business, on solid legal footing.

Associate

Sydney or Canberra, five years post-admission and up.

Special Counsel

Sydney or Canberra, typically eight years and up.

Associate Partner

Sydney or Canberra, a practice you are building.

Wahlstation for German Referendare

Sydney or Canberra, open all year.

Articles

Where the law changed, what it now requires, and what a business has to do about it.

Guides

One question worked through end to end, with the provisions and the decisions it rests on.

Case notes

What a judgment decided, and what follows from it for anyone in the same position.

Germany

A German desk for businesses moving between Australia and the German-speaking market.

Singapore

Singapore law where it governs the contract, and the arbitral seat that carries much of the region’s work.

Vietnam

Market entry, supply arrangements and dispute resolution for Vietnam.

COURT AND TRIBUNAL

Basan v Watts McCray: proceeding transferred to the ACT

6 October 2016
A claim against four sets of professional advisers was commenced in the Supreme Court of Western Australia, although the events, the advisers and almost all of the witnesses were in the ACT. We acted for the second defendant and applied to transfer the proceeding under the cross-vesting legislation.
The Court transferred it: Basan v Watts McCray (A Firm) [2016] WASC 321. The judgment adopts the factors advanced in the second defendant’s written submissions, being that the remaining defendants’ places of business and our client’s registered office were in the ACT, that eleven potential witnesses lived there, that the events giving rise to the claim occurred there, that ACT law governed the claims, and that a trial in Perth would cost the ACT parties more to run.
The Court held that the ACT Supreme Court was the natural and appropriate forum and that the interests of justice favoured the transfer. A transfer decides where a case is heard and nothing about who wins it, and the proceeding continued in the ACT.
Read the judgment: AustLII

Sydney

Canberra

Frankfurt a.M.