Corporate & Commercial

Contracts, structures and governance for businesses that need the paperwork to hold when something goes wrong.

Mergers & Acquisitions

Buying or selling a business, from the term sheet and due diligence through to completion and the restraints that follow.

Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Commercial disputes in the NSW, ACT and Federal courts, resolved early where that is possible and run properly where it is not.

Government and Defence

Supplying government and the defence industry.

Technology and Software

Your product scales digitally. Your contracts have to scale with it.

Financial Services

A regulated business, on solid legal footing.

Associate

Sydney or Canberra, five years post-admission and up.

Special Counsel

Sydney or Canberra, typically eight years and up.

Associate Partner

Sydney or Canberra, a practice you are building.

Wahlstation for German Referendare

Sydney or Canberra, open all year.

Articles

Where the law changed, what it now requires, and what a business has to do about it.

Guides

One question worked through end to end, with the provisions and the decisions it rests on.

Case notes

What a judgment decided, and what follows from it for anyone in the same position.

Germany

A German desk for businesses moving between Australia and the German-speaking market.

Singapore

Singapore law where it governs the contract, and the arbitral seat that carries much of the region’s work.

Vietnam

Market entry, supply arrangements and dispute resolution for Vietnam.

COURT AND TRIBUNAL

Cooper v Myrtace Consulting: leave for a derivative action refused

14 May 2014
A shareholder applied under section 237 of the Corporations Act for leave to bring proceedings in the company’s name against its sole director, alleging misappropriation of the proceeds of a share sale, an improper issue of shares to himself, and a failure to wind the company up.
The Federal Court refused leave and ordered the applicant to pay the company’s costs: Cooper v Myrtace Consulting Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 480. An applicant has to satisfy all five criteria in section 237, and the one that decided the case was whether the proposed action was in the best interests of the company.
The Court accepted there was a serious question to be tried on three of the pleaded claims and none on the rest. Leave still failed, because the applicant could not offer the company a meaningful indemnity for the costs it would be exposed to. Matters put as reasons the director should not be shielded by the corporate form, being unlodged tax returns and financial records not kept, were not pleaded and could not supply the criterion that was missing.
Read the judgment: AustLII

Sydney

Canberra

Frankfurt a.M.