Corporate & Commercial

Contracts, structures and governance for businesses that need the paperwork to hold when something goes wrong.

Mergers & Acquisitions

Buying or selling a business, from the term sheet and due diligence through to completion and the restraints that follow.

Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Commercial disputes in the NSW, ACT and Federal courts, resolved early where that is possible and run properly where it is not.

Government and Defence

Supplying government and the defence industry.

Technology and Software

Your product scales digitally. Your contracts have to scale with it.

Financial Services

A regulated business, on solid legal footing.

Legal Administration Assistant, Canberra

Canberra office, full time, on site.

Wahlstation for German Referendare

Sydney or Canberra, open all year.

The track record

Judgments and tribunal outcomes, transactions completed, appointments taken, and the conversations we are part of in Australia and in Germany.

Germany

A German desk for businesses moving between Australia and the German-speaking market.

Singapore

Singapore law where it governs the contract, and the arbitral seat that carries much of the region’s work.

Vietnam

Market entry, supply arrangements and dispute resolution for Vietnam.

COURT AND TRIBUNAL

Read v Burns: judgment for our client on a misleading conduct claim

27 July 2017
The purchaser of a serviced apartment sued his conveyancing solicitor, the promoter of the scheme and the promoter’s director. He alleged misleading and deceptive conduct about what the apartment could be used for and the returns it would produce, and that the management arrangement was an unregistered managed investment scheme.
After trial in the Supreme Court of the ACT there was judgment for the first and third defendants against the plaintiff, with costs: Read v Burns [2017] ACTSC 184. The reasons run to 455 paragraphs.
The claim failed on the evidence as much as on the law. The plaintiff gave his own valuation and loss evidence, and the Court held he had shown no qualification to give it and that there was no reliable evidence of the losses claimed under any head. The claim for exemplary damages failed twice over, because such damages were not available under the statutes relied on and because the case came nowhere near warranting them.
Two earlier judgments in the same proceeding dealt with the shape of the pleading, in 2013 and in 2016.
Read the judgment: AustLII
WHERE THIS SITS

Sydney

Canberra

Frankfurt a.M.